Showing posts with label public education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public education. Show all posts

Monday, March 4, 2013

Time for colleges to have skin in the game-They need to guarantee student loans



America’s student loan debt is in excess of 1 trillion dollars; it is believed this will be our next huge financial crisis as these loans go into default.

One of the reasons people are having a difficult time repaying their student debt, is that they can’t find jobs as newly minted college graduates. See the 10 worst college degrees by Forbes.

Granted the economy is in the doldrums and good jobs are hard to find.  But a college education was sold to these students by the education industry as their ticket to a good paying job.

Let’s use some outcome based education for a change. If you are going to let a student burden him/herself with a huge debt in order to graduate from your school, you should have some skin in the game.  Colleges should have to guarantee these loans, instead of laying that debt off onto taxpayers if the student defaults. Perhaps there would be a change in admissions, stricter standards and heavier counseling.

Right now colleges and universities have the best of all worlds.  Many are in receipt of government funding, many have endowments and almost all are the recipients of an unending stream of government guaranteed tuition. There is no incentive for them to see if the student loans ever get paid back.

It’s a one way street in the higher education system and it’s time to make some changes. . These easy government backed student loans are correlated to rising costs. Colleges have every incentive to raise costs knowing the loans will be adjusted upward to reflect those costs.

Colleges should have job placement programs for the students they graduate.  There needs to be some responsibility from the higher education system and some accountability.

Should taxpayers be put on the hook for a college graduate with a liberal arts degree who can’t find a job?  Or if the jobs available with those degrees are low paying and will never be able to justify the student loan amount?

Additionally, let’s face it, many of those attending college aren’t college material and should be learning a trade or craft.  Skilled craftsmen make on average far more than many college graduates.  Why aren’t colleges and universities offering these types of educations?

The country has a problem supplying the manpower needs of our high tech sector, so much of a problem, that special laws are being created to allow foreign workers into our country that have the math and engineering skills necessary to work in this environment.

We should be proactively pushing students to get educations in the sectors the country desperately has a shortage in, even offering discount tuition, etc. Perhaps even using a hybrid of the voucher system that the Friedman Foundation is promoting for public school choice and introduce some competition.

If a student wants a degree in ethnic/gender studies, music appreciation, law and a whole host of liberal arts that don’t necessarily translate into lucrative careers, then there should be an agreement between the college and the student over how the tuition gets paid. Let colleges aid the student in finding scholarship help, etc. 

We saw the problem that unfulfilled promises academic institutions made to students when our cities were clogged with Occupy Wall Street. Many of these young people expressed anger at their inability to find a job, a good paying job with the liberal arts degrees they possessed.  They felt they were lied to by their education institutions…in a way they were.

There is also growing unrest among students who are seeing their ever increasing college tuitions rise, while chancellors and educators don’t take a hit and in fact get raises.

Here is an excerpt from an excellent expose’ by JosephPalermo in the California State University system:

“Last year, CSU executives were paid between $240,000 and $400,000 in salary alone. On top of that, each executive is allotted $12,000 per year as an auto allowance. Campus Presidents and the Chancellor each receive either state-owned homes or housing allowances of $50,000 or $60,000 per year. Other perks available to executives include special retirement packages such as lifetime employment as a tenured professor.”

Looking at the above salaries you can see these educators are insulated from the realities that many graduates face after they leave their institutes of higher education.  Instead of raises, many of them should be fired. Let’s get some accountability into education





Thursday, May 24, 2012

Mitt Romney's school voucher push should headline suspended North Carolina teacher

The recent case of a North Carolina high school student berated by his teacher for daring to question her pro Obama rants, has opened a window into the public school classrooms of America.

For months the student had listened to the teacher during "open discussions" rant on about President Obama's virtues among other topics and would not tolerate any dissent.  It was basically a one way conversation and not an open discussion if you disagreed with her political beliefs.

Tonya Dixon-Neely, a teacher at North Rowan High School in North Carolina, caught on video scolding a student for speaking negatively about President Obama, has now been suspended, of course with pay....In the private sector this is called paid vacation.

Here's an excerpt from the exchange:

Teacher: “Let me tell you something now about me. As a teacher, I’m not supposed to allow you to disrespect the President of the United States. ”

Student: "I’m not.  I didn’t disrespect him, I was just asking a question.”

Teacher:  “You are. You do, you always do.”

Student “I have, I have different beliefs.”

Teacher:  “You can have a different belief, but you will not disrespect him in here.”

The teacher went on to say that when George Bush was President, people were arrested for saying bad things about him, saying, “You are not supposed to slander the President.

---------------------------------------

Listen to teachers recorded outburst and interview of  the student and his mother on Fox and Friends

-----------------------------------------
In this teachers world it is slander to question the President of the United States.... And she is responsible for teaching hundreds of young minds?.  Will this "teacher" be kept on the payroll due to union rules that make it nearly impossible to get rid of incompetents in the system?

This teacher knows absolutely nothing about civics.

But the real question is, where did this teacher get her PC education to be able to assault our children with these false beliefs?  Sadly, for the most part,  parents have little choice where they can send their children for an education if they can't afford a private school..


The public education system has broken down into a broken record.  You can see the end product in the Occupy movement,  mostly young people who feel cheated because life isn't giving them what they had been promised after receiving their "education".  Of course if they would have received an education, heavy in mathematics, science, engineering, or medicine, there would be recruiters banging on their doors to offer them jobs.

The public school industry, dominated by public sector unions whose leaders have stated on the record their main goal is power.  Their default message is? More money. This message is starting to ring hollow and parents are voting with their feet when given the opportunity,  by sending their children to newly established charter schools and alternative education institutions.  These alternatives in public education, not fettered with the same constraints and bureaucracy that regular public schools have, are flooded with applicants and have huge waiting lists.

This hunger by parents to escape the mediocrity of the public education industry has not gone unnoticed in political circles and there is a movement afoot to offer help to desperate parents who want a real education for their children.

Mitt Romney has come out boldly in favor of school choice.  The simple answer to this is to offer parents vouchers for the same amount of money which is given schools per pupil.  These vouchers can be taken to a school of their choice, public or private,  that will pay for their children's education. 

This is a win win situation for our nations future and our children.  It opens up the education industry to competition, something unheard of these days. If schools want students, then they must offer a good product or go by the wayside....because the newly opened school down the street will.  Good teachers will be kept, excellent teachers will be rewarded and cherished. Teachers like Tonya-Dison Neely will be fired.

Instead of hi tech/science/engineering and medicine begging to import foreign workers because there are not enough qualified applicants being produced by our schools...foreign countries will be recruiting students from our schools to fill their workforces.

School vouchers, school choice....The time has come for our country to move forward with this.  But it will take courageous leaders to bring these changes about.  It can start by electing a President who is willing to take the steps necessary to implement this monumental leap.

The most unique gifts: Time capsules in American and world history: lifemagforsale.com

For other points of view visit Carroll Standard: carrollstandard.com